On the circularity of democratic justice.
Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35 (9).
Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/10921
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0191453709343391
In this article, I argue that justice and democracy stand in a circular relationship: just outcomes emerge from democratic deliberations, but only if such deliberations meet the standards of justice. I develop my argument by engaging in a critical dialogue with Nancy Fraser. Contending that she fails to deal with the danger that unfair deliberative procedures and inadequate norms of justice may reinforce one another, I show what a satisfactory account of democratic justice would look like. Going beyond Fraser’s theory, I maintain that although ustice and democracy do form a circular relationship, it is essential to give the former greater weight than the latter. I finesse my account by showing what this differential weighting would entail in practice. The result is an account of democratic justice that is significantly different from and a marked improvement on that of Fraser.
Request a change to this item
Total Document Downloads in Past 12 Months