Failing the challenge of institutional evaluation: How and why managerialism flourishes.
In: Bamber, V., Trowler, P. and Saunders, M., eds.
Reconceptualising Evaluative Practice in Higher Education.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/12321
Publisher's URL: http://mcgraw-hill.co.uk/html/0335241611.html
Governments spending billions and individuals spending thousands of pounds on higher education (HE) rightly expect accountability for how the money is used. But pressure for accountability has accelerated the spread of managerialism, jeopardising rather than improving quality and posing dilemmas for managers trying to reconcile internal and external pressures. In the managerialist dialectic, unthinking resistance meets unthinking control, an unwinnable battle between the stereotypes of ‘academic populism’ and ‘new managerialism’ (Watson 200, 2009:77). Managers and staff could respond more effectively to the challenge of evaluation by thinking differently about managing, to find social practices embodying the values needed to transcend managerialist pressures. In this chapter I use the case of league tables and draw on theory and practice (including my own experience as Pro and Deputy Vice-Chancellor in a large ‘mid-table’ university) to sketch an alternative approach.
|Item Type:||Book Section|
|Additional Information:||This material is reproduced with the kind permission of the Open University Press.|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||league table, university rankings, managerialism, institutional evaluation|
|Faculty/Department:||Faculty of Arts, Creative Industries and Education > Department of Education|
Professor R. Cuthbert
|Deposited On:||13 Jan 2011 16:41|
|Last Modified:||31 Jan 2016 04:15|
Request a change to this item
Total Document Downloads in Past 12 Months