Why practitioners don't read our articles and what we should do about it

No Altmetrics are currently available for this publication.

Tapp, A. (2005) Why practitioners don't read our articles and what we should do about it. The Marketing Review, 5 (1). pp. 3-13. ISSN 1469-347X Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/13470

Full text not available from this repository.


This article questions the value of much academic marketing's 'top' journal literature. The argument made is that current strong pressures (driven by the RAE) to publish in journals that are dominated by positivistic approaches is damaging to both pure and applied academics. A detailed critique of some recent articles is used to highlight specific failings that, in this author's view, need to be urgently addressed. The paper concludes that a key role for applied academic marketing research is to provide a platform that allows managers to construct knowledge that is usually applied with their local context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: marketing literature, marketing research, marketing executives, marketing periodicals, positivism, academic, practice interface, Lambert Report
Faculty/Department: Faculty of Business and Law
Depositing User: H. Carey
Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2010 14:34
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2017 15:10
URI: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/id/eprint/13470


Activity Overview
Origin of downloads

Additional statistics for this repository are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item