Neuroscientific evidence in the English courts

Claydon, L. and Catley, P. (2011) Neuroscientific evidence in the English courts. In: Spranger, T. M. and Wagmann, H., eds. (2011) International Neurolaw a Comparative Analysis. Springer. ISBN 9783642215407

Full text not available from this repository

Publisher's URL: http://www.springer.com/law/book/978-3-642-21540-7

Abstract

This chapter examines the use of neuroscientific evidence in the courts of England and Wales. It considers the breadth of uses which has been made of this evidence. In particular it examines the use of this evidence in cases where the capacity of the legal actor has been questioned. This may apply in evaluations of criminal responsibility and in a civil context in assessing capacity to perform legally meaningful actions such as the making of wills. Consideration is given to what this evidence adds to de-terminations of whether individuals are in a persistent vegetative state in particular in relation to the withdrawal of treatment. The chapter looks at the use of expert evidence in court and briefly considers proposed changes. Finally the chapter considers how neuroscientific evidence may be used in the future and also whether it has wider application in the criminal and civil justice systems.

Item Type:Book Section
Uncontrolled Keywords:neurolaw, neuroscience and law,crime, capacity to testate, compensation for injury, expert evidence
Faculty/Department:Faculty of Business and Law > Department of Law
ID Code:14672
Deposited By: Dr L. Claydon
Deposited On:25 May 2011 15:50
Last Modified:21 Feb 2013 11:47

Request a change to this item

Copyright 2013 © UWE better together