The inadequacy of mainstream theories of trade unions.
Labour, 21 (6).
Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/15986
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00103
This paper identifies four criteria used by mainstream economists of trade unions to judge the adequacy of their various theories. Three of them, however, are hardly ever satisfied. The root cause of this failure is the method adopted by mainstream economic theory, namely deductivism. The perspective of critical realism is used to identify and explain the cause of this failure and to point towards an alternative method.
|Additional Information:||This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fleetwood, S. (1999) The inadequacy of mainstream theories of trade unions. Labour, 21 (6). pp. 445-480, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00103. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||trade unions|
|Faculty/Department:||Faculty of Business and Law|
|Deposited On:||09 Nov 2011 16:14|
|Last Modified:||21 Oct 2016 17:00|
Request a change to this item
Total Document Downloads in Past 12 Months