Black-boxing sustainability

Rice, L. (2011) Black-boxing sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4 (4). pp. 32-37. ISSN 1913-9063

Full text not available from this repository

Publisher's URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/artic...

Abstract

The term ‘sustainable’ has rapidly become a ubiquitous prefix for many contemporary issues, professions and disciplines. This paper contextualizes the debate by exploring how the term ‘sustainable’ has emerged within the field of architecture. The paper examines the semiotics of sustainability; how the meaning of this word has been produced from an assemblage of words, signs and practices. Adopting ‘Actor-Network Theory’ (ANT) methodology to examine the embedding of sustainability as the dominant paradigm in architecture. The creation of a definition of sustainability has been hybridized into a social, legal, economic, political and scientific framework. A process of ‘sustainabilization’ has occurred not only within architecture but across a number of different subjects. The research investigates how carbon-dioxide has played an important role in the promulgation of sustainability. The current framework within which ‘sustainability’ operates is currently too narrow and inflexible (i.e. black-boxed) with too much emphasis on CO2 to respond meaningfully to the demands from human development.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:sustainability, actor-network theory, architecture, urban design, hybrid, knowledge, power
Faculty/Department:Faculty of Environment and Technology > Department of Architecture and the Built Environment
ID Code:16026
Deposited By: L. Rice
Deposited On:23 Nov 2011 12:58
Last Modified:05 Jan 2014 06:57

Request a change to this item

Document Downloads

Total Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
Copyright 2013 © UWE better together