Paul O. Olomolaiye
A conceptual alternative to current tendering practice: Majority of UK construction projects assigned by way of selective competition, an alternative quantitative selection technique has been developed by the authors which could equally apply elsewhere
Olomolaiye, Paul O.; Holt, Gary D.; Olomolaiye, Paul; Harris, Frank C.
Authors
Gary D. Holt
Paul Olomolaiye Paul.Olomolaiye@uwe.ac.uk
Pro Vice-Chancellor Equalities and Civic Engagement
Frank C. Harris
Abstract
The research to date has borne a fundamental decision aid model to assist the construction owner in choosing a contractor. The model is currently being stabilized and validated. A comprehensive survey has been carried out to verify the variables and their weighting indices. Liaison with construction owners suggests that such a selection process developed into an expert system would be welcomed by the UK construction industry. © 1993, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.
Citation
Olomolaiye, P. O., Holt, G. D., Olomolaiye, P., & Harris, F. C. (1993). A conceptual alternative to current tendering practice: Majority of UK construction projects assigned by way of selective competition, an alternative quantitative selection technique has been developed by the authors which could equally apply elsewhere. Building Research and Information, 21(3), 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613219308727284
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 1, 1993 |
Journal | Building Research & Information |
Print ISSN | 0961-3218 |
Electronic ISSN | 1466-4321 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 21 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 167-172 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/09613219308727284 |
Keywords | tendering practice, construction industry, contractor selection technique, evaluation, expert system |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1109557 |
Publisher URL | http://www.routledge.com/ |