Online access panels for surveys on public health and epidemiology

Nancarrow, C. and Tapp, A. (2014) Online access panels for surveys on public health and epidemiology. Discussion Paper. University of the West of England. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/23013

[img]
Preview
PDF
559kB

Publisher's URL: http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/bl/blresearch/bsmc/publicati...

Abstract/Description

In both the private and public sectors research on attitudes and behaviour is often carried out using “online access panels” – panels sometimes consisting of hundreds of thousands of members of the public who have agreed to answer questionnaires on a variety of topics. However, such panels are currently little used in health care research, perhaps a surprise given Van Gelder, Bredveld and Roeleveld’s (2010) comment “...web-based questionnaires could be considered an alternative or complementary mode in the range of epidemiologic methods of data collection”. Thus in this paper we examine what a typical online access panel is and what it might offer to health care researchers. To set online access panels into context, the potential biases associated with them are examined, and these are compared with the other main modes of data collection. It is argued that an evaluation of the validity of modes of data collection should be based on a number of criteria to decide which mode is most likely to reflect accurately the characteristics of a specific population, in particular its demographics, lifestyle, attitudes and behaviour. Validity is not just a function of the sampling design and the extent and nature of any non-response bias but also of the willingness and ability of respondents to give honest and accurate information. In the case of online access panels the merits of reduced socially desirable responding and greater willingness to provide sensitive information are noted. The positive and negative sides of ‘panel learning’ are also reported. Whether there is one single definitive statement about the relative validity of the different modes is considered. Experimenting with key questions across modes is suggested.

Item Type:Report or Working Paper (Discussion Paper)
Additional Information:The paper has been reviewed by two leading online access panel researchers*. We would like to thank them both for their comments and suggestions. The views on the relative merits of different modes of data collection are those of the authors. Any errors or controversial judgements are solely the responsibility of the authors. *Trixie Cartwright, Head of Ipsos Interactive Services UK of Ipsos MORI formerly of TNS and Lightspeed and Gavin Ellison, Director of Public Services and NFP at YouGov.
Uncontrolled Keywords:online survey, access panels
Faculty/Department:Faculty of Business and Law
ID Code:23013
Deposited By: S. Warren
Deposited On:12 May 2014 09:58
Last Modified:27 Jan 2017 16:10

Request a change to this item

Total Document Downloads in Past 12 Months

Document Downloads

Total Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...