Does transport investment really boost economic growth?

No Altmetrics are currently available for this publication.

Melia, S. (2018) Does transport investment really boost economic growth? World Transport Policy and Practice, 23 (3&4). pp. 118-128. ISSN 1352-7614 Available from:

Does Transport Investment Really Boost Economic Growth.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (215kB) | Preview


The SACTRA (1999) report on Transport and the Economy found strong theoretical grounds for believing that transport investment could boost national economies but that the empirical evidence was “weak and disputed”. This study asks whether a different conclusion should be drawn today. The different approaches to evaluating the relationship between transport investment and economic output are reviewed: cross-sectional and time series, regional, cross-regional and national. The range of elasticities calculated is large: mostly positive but sometimes negative. There is fairly strong (but highly variable) evidence that transport investment (measured in a variety of ways) can influence local economic output and/or employment. At national levels there is strong evidence of cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between these factors but the issue of causality (what causes what?) remains unresolved. Various methods used to address the issue of causality are reviewed. Studies using Granger causality produce mixed findings; in some cases economic growth precedes transport investment; in others transport investment precedes economic growth. Some local or regional studies have found negative ‘spillover effects’ of transport investment on surrounding areas. None of the studies reviewed has empirically demonstrated that transport investment boosts national GDP or employment growth. Claims to that effect are (still) based on theoretical analysis, which should be treated with caution for several reasons, particularly: the aggregation problem and deadweight loss. The aggregation problem means for example, that increased productivity in the area around a new road will not necessarily increase national production. Deadweight loss is the negative economic impact of taxation, or deferred taxation when infrastructure is financed by borrowing. Given the uncertainty surrounding these findings, the study concludes that claims made about the national economic benefits of transport investment are not robustly supported by the underlying evidence. It is more appropriate to view transport investment as a facilitative factor rather than a causal factor.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: economic impacts of transport, transport appraisal, wider economic impacts, Granger causality, cost-benefit analysis, transport infrastructure, economic growth
Faculty/Department: Faculty of Environment and Technology > Department of Geography and Environmental Management
Depositing User: Dr S. Melia
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2017 14:12
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2018 19:13


Activity Overview
Origin of downloads

Additional statistics for this repository are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item