Smart contracts in construction: Views and perceptions of stakeholders

No Altmetrics are currently available for this publication.

Mason, J. and Escott, H. (2018) Smart contracts in construction: Views and perceptions of stakeholders. Proceedings of FIG Conference, Istanbul May 2018. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/35123

[img] Microsoft Word 2007
FIGrevised.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (1MB)
[img]
Preview
PDF
FIGrevised.pdf
Available under License All Rights Reserved.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract/Description

Smart contracts and blockchain technology are at the forefront of technological advancement in the financial services industry. The basic premise involves the creation of an automated contract capable of satisfying common conditions and reducing the need for intermediaries in the process. The blockchain is a means by which the transactions can be recorded on a distributed ledger. The enquiry carried out in this paper discusses whether these technologies are capable of being transposed into the United Kingdom’s (UK) construction industry and whether this is a desirable outcome. Technological progression is much slower in construction than in other industries as evidenced by the slow take up of UK government-backed initiatives such as the introduction of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and collaborative working agendas. A survey questionnaire was designed and distributed to investigate attitudes towards technology and collaborative working. A variety of professions across various organisations including clients, main contractors, consultants and law firms returned 117 responses mainly from senior management or commercial staff. There were divisions between participants believing technology and innovation are important, exciting and the future and those who believe automation is an impossible task in such a complex industry as construction. Key findings reveal a fear of the unknown and the overwhelming doubt from participants that full automation is possible. There was an acknowledgement that the technology could benefit simple supply-type contracts and that it would be beneficial to reduce the amount of paperwork involved in contract administration. There is a view throughout the industry that disputes cannot be solved with a computer. Opinions were further split along the lines of whether human interaction and relationships are key and technology would detract from or enhance the position.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: smart contracts, blockchain, construction contracts, technology
Faculty/Department: Faculty of Environment and Technology > Department of Architecture and the Built Environment
Depositing User: Dr J. Mason
Date Deposited: 26 Feb 2018 15:41
Last Modified: 07 Jun 2019 02:23
URI: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/id/eprint/35123

Statistics

Downloads
Activity Overview
1,702Downloads
1,599Hits
Origin of downloads

Additional statistics for this repository are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item