Rheumatology outcomes: The patient's perspective

Carr, A., Hewlett, S., Hughes, R., Mitchell, H., Ryan, S., Carr, M. and Kirwan, J. R. (2003) Rheumatology outcomes: The patient's perspective. Journal of Rheumatology, 30 (4). pp. 880-883. ISSN 0315-162X Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/5712

Full text not available from this repository

Publisher's URL: http://www.jrheum.org/content/30/4/880.abstract


Our aim was to explore the patient's perspective of outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to identify which outcomes are important to patients and how patients calibrate what constitutes a meaningful change in those outcomes. A qualitative study was performed using focus groups in 5 clinical centers in different geographical locations in the UK. Each group contained 6 to 9 patients with RA who were purposefully sampled to include men and women with a range of age, disease duration, functional disability, work disability, and current disease activity. Each focus group lasted around 1 h and addressed 3 questions: What outcomes from treatment are important to RA patients? What makes patients satisfied or dissatisfied with a treatment? How do patients decide that a treatment is working? Patients identified as important not only physical outcomes such as pain and disability, but also fatigue and a general feeling of wellness. The relative importance of these outcomes depended on the stage of disease and on specific situations, such as a disease flare. Satisfaction was influenced by communication, access to treatment, and treatment efficacy. Treatment efficacy was related to symptom reduction, with the magnitude of reduction necessary for efficacy dependent on the stage of disease. For example, large changes were deemed necessary with disease of long duration, while in early disease, even small changes could be important. Our data support existing knowledge of the importance of pain and mobility as treatment outcomes, but raise new and important issues: Some outcomes of importance to patients are not currently measured and there are no measures available to capture them. Existing measures need to be calibrated to take account of the differing importance of outcomes at different stages of disease and variations in the magnitude of change within the same outcome that indicate treatment efficacy.

Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Demonstrated that outcomes important to patients differ from those that are important to and routinely measured by health professionals. Oral presentations in Australia, USA and Portugal. Led to funding for PhD studentship on well-being and studies on fatigue (Arthritis Research Campaign).
Uncontrolled Keywords:rheumatology, patients perspective
Faculty/Department:Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences > Department of Nursing and Midwifery
ID Code:5712
Deposited By: R. Upload account
Deposited On:22 Jan 2010 15:09
Last Modified:15 Nov 2016 18:57

Request a change to this item