The disempowerment of empowerment: How stakeholding clogs up rural decision-making.
Space and Polity, 13 (3).
Publisher's URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562570903454309
In the context of a growth in both participatory democracy and responsible participation, rural decision-making in England has become increasingly complex over the past 30 years, fuelled by national polices relating to regionalism, citizenship and relocalisation. A survey of ‘agents of rural governance’ (ARGs) in the county of Gloucestershire, England, charts their recent growth, reasons for formation and perceived jurisdiction as well as examining complexities of decision-making relating to partnerships, networks and finance. The survey suggests that policies designed to ‘empower’ rural people can be seen to have clogged up rural decision-making processes sufficiently to have, effectively, disempowered many of them. The paper identifies and exemplifies six different types of ‘clogging up’ that impact upon rural decision-making: crowding, knotting, clouding, meandering, subverting and impoverishing. Whilst governmental proposals have been introduced in an attempt to rationalise this decision-making complexity, particularly through the Haskins Review and the English National Rural Strategy, other policy strands have conspired to make such decision-making essentially laissez faire.
|Additional Information:||This is an electronic version of an article published in Curry, Nigel (2009) The disempowerment of empowerment: How stakeholding clogs up rural decision-making. Space and Polity, 13 (3). pp. 213-232. Space and Polity is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/13562570903454309|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||rural community participation, governmentality, rural decison-making|
|Faculty/Department:||Faculty of Environment and Technology|
Professor N. Curry
|Deposited On:||20 Jul 2010 09:38|
|Last Modified:||29 Jul 2015 11:04|
Request a change to this item
Total Document Downloads in Past 12 Months